Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01-16-25 | Gonzaga -9 v. Oregon State | Top | 89-97 | Loss | -115 | 7 h 30 m | Show |
Gonzaga vs Oregon State The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 31-8 SU and 26-12-1 ATS record good for 68% winning bets since 2018. The requirements are: Bet on favorites between 3.5and 9.5 points. They have scored 75 or more points in five consecutive games. They are facing a foe off win by 30 or more points. |
|||||||
01-16-25 | CS-Fullerton +19.5 v. Cal-Irvine | 62-82 | Loss | -108 | 6 h 30 m | Show | |
CS-Fullerton vs UC-Irvine The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 5-47 SU and 36-16 ATS record good for 69% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: Bet on underdogs priced at 13.5 or more points. They have lost their last three games to conference foes. They are playing on three or more days of rest. The opponent is coming off an upset road win. |
|||||||
01-16-25 | Cavs v. Thunder -1.5 | Top | 114-134 | Win | 100 | 4 h 2 m | Show |
Cavaliers vs Thunder The following NBA betting algorithm has done very well posting a 97-36 SU and 89-41-3 ATS record for 69% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: Bet on home teams. That home team has allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games. The opponent is coming off a game in which they scored 120 or more points. |
|||||||
01-15-25 | Hornets -5 v. Jazz | Top | 117-112 | Push | 0 | 9 h 58 m | Show |
Hornets vs Jazz This NBA betting algorithm has produced a 71-48 SU (60%) and 75-41-3 ATS record for 65% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. Bet on road teams priced as the favorite. The road team is coming off a road loss that went into overtime. The total is 210 or more points. If the game is a non-divisional matchup and the total is 220 or more points, these teams have gone 42-18 SU and 40-18-2 ATS for 59% winning bets. The following NBA betting algorithm has earned a 36-18 SU (67%) and 35-16-3 ATS good for 69% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are: Bet on any team priced between a 3.5-point favorite and a 3.5-poit underdog. That team is coming off a win by 20 or more points. The opponent has scored 115 or more points in three consecutive games. |
|||||||
01-15-25 | Grizzlies v. Spurs +2.5 | Top | 129-115 | Loss | -108 | 8 h 58 m | Show |
Grizzlies vs Spurs The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 25-13 SU and 26-12 ATS mark for 68.4% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are: Bet on home underdogs priced between pick-em and four points. They are facing an opponent that is outscoring their opponents by 6 or more PPG. The opponent has played three straight games in which 220 or more points were scored in each one. The total is priced between 220 and 239.5 points. |
|||||||
01-14-25 | Flames v. Blues -1.5 | 1-2 | Loss | -100 | 9 h 59 m | Show | |
Flames vs Blues The following NHL betting algorithm has produced a 141-92 mark for 61% winners that have averaged a –108 bet resulting in an 18% ROI and earning a $60,400 profit for the $1,000 per game bettor and a $3,020 profit for the $50 per game bettor. The requirements are: Bet on home teams. The visitor is playing with no rest. The visitor is coming off a win by three or more goals. |
|||||||
01-14-25 | Cavs -7.5 v. Pacers | Top | 127-117 | Win | 100 | 8 h 4 m | Show |
Cavs vs Pacers The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 16-50 SU record and a 43-21-2 ATS record good for 67% winning bets since 2021. The requirements are: Bet on road teams that are coming off a horrid double-digit upset loss at home. They defeated the current opponent in their previous meeting and in the same season. They were favored by 3.5 or more points in their previous loss. If the game is a divisional matchup, these road teams have gone 19-6-1 ATS good for 76% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The following NBA betting algorithm has gone 73-39-2 ATS for 65.2% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are: Bet on road teams avenging a same-season loss to the opponent. Our team is coming off a home loss. Our team lost their previous game by double-digits. Our team has a winning record. If our team has won 65% or more of their games, these teams have produced a highly profitable 21-6 ATS record good for 78% winning bets. Season Win-Loss Records Cleveland Cavaliers: 33-4 Indiana Pacers: 20-19 Against the Spread (ATS) Records Cleveland Cavaliers: 27-10 Indiana Pacers: 18-22 Offensive and Defensive Statistics Comparison Statistic Cleveland Cavaliers Indiana Pacers Points Per Game (PPG) 122.9 110.5 Field Goal Percentage 47.2% 45.1% Three-Point Percentage 40.5% 36.2% Free Throw Percentage 78.5% 75.3% Rebounds Per Game (RPG) 43.6 42.1 Assists Per Game (APG) 29.4 24.7 Turnovers Per Game (TO) 14.2 15.3 Defensive Rating (DRTG) 111.1 113.2 Net Rating (NRTG) 11.5 3.3 Assist-to-Turnover Ratios Cleveland Cavaliers: 2.06 Indiana Pacers: 1.61 Key Matchups for the Cavaliers Donovan Mitchell vs. Tyrese Haliburton: Mitchell's scoring ability and playmaking will be crucial against Haliburton, who is known for his defensive prowess. Mitchell's ability to draw fouls and get to the free-throw line could be a significant advantage. Jarrett Allen vs. Myles Turner: Allen's offensive rebounding and inside scoring will be tested against Turner's shot-blocking and defensive skills. Allen's consistency in scoring close to the basket will be key. Darius Garland vs. T.J. McConnell: Garland's playmaking and ability to control the tempo of the game will be essential against McConnell's defensive pressure. Garland's assist-to-turnover ratio will be a critical factor in maintaining offensive efficiency. |
|||||||
01-14-25 | Thunder v. 76ers +11.5 | 118-102 | Loss | -105 | 8 h 4 m | Show | |
76ers vs Thunder Bet on road teams. The home team is on a three or more game ATS losing streak. The road team has covered the spread in seven or more of their last eight games. If our road team is the dog, they have gone 21-6 SU and 18-8-1 ATS good for 70% winning bets since 2014. Season Records Philadelphia 76ers: 13-18 (Straight-Up), 11-20 Against the Spread (ATS) Oklahoma City Thunder: 15-17 (Straight-Up), 14-18 ATS Offensive and Defensive Statistics Comparison Statistic Philadelphia 76ers Oklahoma City Thunder Points Per Game (PPG) 110.2 112.5 Field Goal Percentage 45.3% 46.1% Three-Point Percentage 34.2% 35.4% Free Throw Percentage 76.5% 78.1% Rebounds Per Game (RPG) 44.1 45.3 Assists Per Game (APG) 23.5 24.2 Turnovers Per Game (TO) 14.2 13.8 Opponents PPG 112.3 110.7 Opponents Field Goal % 46.5% 45.9% Opponents Three-Point % 36.1% 35.2% Opponents Free Throw % 77.2% 76.8% Assist-to-Turnover Ratios Team Assist-to-Turnover Ratio Philadelphia 76ers 1.65 Oklahoma City Thunder 1.75 Key Matchups and Edge for the 76ers Joel Embiid vs. Chet Holmgren: Embiid's presence in the paint will be crucial for the 76ers. His ability to score inside and draw fouls can put pressure on Holmgren, who is still developing defensively. Tyrese Maxey vs. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander: Maxey's quickness and playmaking skills will be tested against Gilgeous-Alexander, who is known for his scoring and defensive versatility. Defensive Matchup: The 76ers' defense will need to contain the Thunder's three-point shooting, especially from players like Josh Giddey and Lu Dort. Limiting their outside shots will be key to securing a win. |
|||||||
01-13-25 | Vikings v. Rams +2.5 | Top | 9-27 | Win | 100 | 8 h 56 m | Show |
Minnesota Vikings vs LA Rams The following NFL betting algorithm has produced an 8-18 SU and 16-9 ATS record for 64% winning bets since 2010. The requirements are: Bet on a home dog priced at 1.5 or more points. They are facing for, who had a 6 or more wins line for the season. The foe has already exceeded that wins total by 3 or more games. These teams are 0-3 SUATS in the playoff rounds, which means they have never advanced to the divisional round. The following NFL betting algorithm has produced an 8-18 SU and 16-9 ATS record for 64% winning bets since 2010. The requirements are: Also, teams in the playoff rounds, but not in the Super Bowl, that have exceeded their preseason ‘wins total’ by 3.5 or more wins and are favored have gone 9-7 SU, but just 4-12 ATS for 25% winning bets and this works against the Vikings tonight. The Vikings are avenging a loss to the Rams, who scored 2. Teams that are avening a loss in which the foe score 28 or more points and now favored between pick-em and a 3.5-point favorite in a playoff game, have goe just 9-14 SU and 7-16 ATS for 30% winning bets. NFL Wild Card Game Preview: Minnesota Vikings vs. Los Angeles Rams Straight-Up and Against-the-Spread Trends The Minnesota Vikings enter tonight's game with a strong straight-up (SU) record of 14-3 this season, while the Los Angeles Rams have a 10-7 record. The Vikings have been dominant against the spread (ATS), covering in 12 of their last 15 games, while the Rams have struggled ATS, covering in only 7 of their last 15 games. Team Angles Minnesota Vikings: Offensive Strengths: The Vikings have been prolific on offense, averaging 366.7 yards per game and 25.4 points per game. Quarterback Sam Darnold has been efficient, and wide receiver Justin Jefferson has been a standout performer1. Defensive Strengths: The Vikings' defense has been solid, allowing only 19.6 points per game and ranking 5th in the league. Key Challenge: The Vikings need to avoid a slow start, as they have been one of the best first-quarter teams, averaging 6.4 points per game in the first quarter. Los Angeles Rams: Offensive Strengths: The Rams have a balanced offense, averaging 344.8 yards per game and 21.6 points per game. Quarterback Matthew Stafford has been effective, especially against the blitz2. Defensive Strengths: The Rams' defense has been decent, allowing 22.7 points per game and ranking 17th in the league. Key Challenge: The Rams need to improve their first-quarter performance, as they rank 31st in the league with only 1.8 points per game in the first quarter. NextGen Statistics and Rankings Minnesota Vikings: Passing: Sam Darnold ranks 8th in the league in NextGen Stats' Expected Points Added (EPA) per play. Receiving: Justin Jefferson ranks 2nd in the league in yards per route run. Defensive: The Vikings rank 5th in the league in defensive EPA allowed per play. Los Angeles Rams: Passing: Matthew Stafford ranks 12th in the league in NextGen Stats' Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE). Receiving: Cooper Kupp ranks 3rd in the league in yards per route run. Defensive: The Rams rank 26th in the league in defensive EPA allowed per play. Key Matchups to Watch Justin Jefferson vs. Rams' Secondary: Jefferson's speed and agility will be a significant challenge for the Rams' cornerbacks, especially Ahkello Witherspoon and Darious Williams. Matthew Stafford vs. Vikings' Pass Rush: Stafford's ability to handle the Vikings' blitz will be crucial. The Vikings blitz more than any team in the league, and Stafford will need to be sharp under pressure. Vikings' First Quarter Offense vs. Rams' First Quarter Defense: The Vikings' strong first-quarter offense will be tested against the Rams' struggling first-quarter defense. |
|||||||
01-13-25 | Warriors v. Raptors +6 | Top | 101-104 | Win | 100 | 8 h 38 m | Show |
Warriors vs Raptors The following NBA betting algorithm has gone 46-47 SU and 59-32-2 ATS for 65% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Betting on underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points. They are coming off three consecutive road losses. They are now facing a non-conference foe. If our team has a losing record and the foe has a winning record, our dogs have gone 27-19 SU and 33-11-2 ATS for 75% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. |
|||||||
01-13-25 | Coppin State +13.5 v. Howard | Top | 75-90 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 27 m | Show |
Coppin State vs Howard The following college basketball betting algorithm has produced an 8-73 SU and 54-27 ATSrecord good for 67% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: Bet on double-digit road dogs. The dog has been outscored by 8 or more PPG. They are facing a foe that has posted a scoring differential between –3 and +3 PPG. The favorite has seen their last two games combine for a total of 155 or more points in each game. If the game takes place form game number 15 on out, these big dogs have gone 3-36 SU and 29-10 ATS for 74% winning bets since 2006. Coppin State Eagles The Coppin State Eagles have had a challenging season, currently holding a record of 2-15 overall and 1-2 in the MEAC Conference. Despite their struggles, the Eagles have a few standout players: Toby Nnadozie: Leading the team with an average of 10.2 points and 12.2 rebounds per game. Jonathan Dunn: Contributing 8.4 points and 4.6 rebounds per game. Peter Oduro: Adding 7.5 points and 3.5 rebounds per game. Advanced Team Statistics: Assist-Turnover Ratio: 0.7 (Rank: 320th nationally) Assist to Field Goal Made Ratio: 0.32 (Rank: 315th nationally) Howard University Bison The Howard University Bison have been more successful this season, with a record of 6-10 overall and 3-1 in the MEAC Conference. They have several key players who have been instrumental to their performance: Jahkiya Williams: Averaging 15.3 points and 4.2 assists per game. Jaden Gardner: Contributing 14.1 points and 5.6 rebounds per game. Jahvon Blair: Adding 10.8 points and 3.1 assists per game. Advanced Team Statistics: Assist-Turnover Ratio: 1.2 (Rank: 150th nationally) Assist to Field Goal Made Ratio: 0.45 (Rank: 200th nationally) |
|||||||
01-12-25 | Commanders +3 v. Bucs | Top | 23-20 | Win | 100 | 9 h 41 m | Show |
Commanders vs Bucs Here is an NFL betting algorithm that has gone 22-29 SU (43%) and 34-16-1 ATS good for 68% winning bets over the past 7 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on road dogs facing a divisional foe for the second time in the same season. In the first matchup, our dog gained 6 or more yards after the completion. If the game takes place in the playoffs, they have gone 5-3 SU and 7-1 ATS for 88% winning bets. If our team is priced between a 3.5 and 9.5-poit underdog they have gone 12-15 SU and 18-9 ATS for 67% winners. From the Predictive Model: My predictive model is expecting the Commanders to score 27 or more points and have the same or fewer turnovers. The Commanders are 8-3 SU and 9-1-1 ATS in past games since 2022 when they have met or exceeded this performance measure. In addition, and based on the model projections, note that teams in the Wild Card round that have scored 27 or more points and gained at least 6 yards after the catch, have gone 8-1 SUATS. Washington Commanders: The Commanders finished the regular season with a 12-5 record, securing the No. 6 seed in the NFC. They have been impressive on offense, averaging 28.5 points per game, which ranks fifth-best in the NFL. Defensively, they allow 23.0 points per game, ranking 18th in the league. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: The Buccaneers ended the regular season with a 10-7 record, winning the NFC South. They have a potent offense, averaging 29.5 points per game, ranking fourth best in the NFL. Their defense allows 22.6 points per game, ranking 16th in the league. Key Matchups Commanders' Offense vs. Buccaneers' Defense: The Commanders' offense, led by rookie quarterback Jayden Daniels, will face a tough challenge against the Buccaneers' defense4. Daniels has shown great potential and will need to make smart decisions and accurate throws to keep the Buccaneers' defense on their toes. Buccaneers' Offense vs. Commanders' Defense: The Buccaneers' offense, led by veteran quarterback Baker Mayfield, will look to exploit the Commanders' defense. Mayfield has a strong arm and a knack for making big plays, but he will need to avoid turnovers and sustain drives to keep the Commanders' offense off the field. Rookie Running Backs: Both teams feature dynamic rookie running backs. Buccaneers' Bucky Irving has been a standout performer, leading all rookies in rushing yards. Commanders' Chris Rodriguez Jr. has also made a significant impact with his running game. The battle between these two rookies will be crucial in determining the outcome of the game. Special Teams: Special teams play can often be a game-changer in the playoffs. Both teams will need to excel in kickoffs, punts, and field goals to gain an edge. Possible Commanders' Upset Win For the Commanders to pull off an upset, they will need to: Limit Turnovers: Avoid giving the Buccaneers extra possessions and scoring opportunities. Establish the Run Game: Utilize B. Robinson and Chris Rodriquez, Jr. to control the clock and keep the Buccaneers' offense off the field. A solid ground attack will open play-action vertical routes in man coverage to McLaurin, Zaccheus, and others. Pressure Mayfield: Generate a strong pass rush with solid gap discipline to disrupt Mayfield's rhythm and force him into mistakes. Win the Field Position Battle: Ensure their special teams perform well to give their offense favorable field position. |
|||||||
01-12-25 | Packers +5.5 v. Eagles | Top | 10-22 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 22 m | Show |
Packers vs Eagles This is a marquee matchup for the Wild Card Round and gets the nod for the game to start at 4:25 EST. The Packers have the characteristics of a team capable to make a deep playoff run. They possess the ability to stretch defenses with vertical routes and their defense forces turnovers. Road teams in the playoffs that forced an average of 1.8 or more turnovers per game during the regular season and averaged 7 or more passing yards per attempt have gone 12-9 SU and 15-4 ATS for 79% winning bets. Road teams in the playoffs that averaged 7.5 or more passing yards per attempt have gone 27-32 SU and 37-20-2 ATS for 65% winning bets. Road teams in the playoffs that forced an average of 1.8 or more turnovers per game during the regular season have gone 45-52 SU and 55-38-4 ATS good for 59% winning bets. Now, the Eagles had a great regular season with a 14-3 record and went 12-1 from week 5 on out. They had the 30th (easy) strength of schedule, however. Teams cannot help or control the quality of the teams they play. The Packers losses have been against playoff teams in Minnesota and Detroit twice each, the Eagles, and the Teams in the Wild Card round that exceeded their regular season wins total by three or more games, their regular season wins line was 6 or more games (Eagles line was 10.5 wins), and are favored, have gone 7-8 SU and 3-12 ATS for just 20% winning bets. Here is an NFL betting algorithm that has gone 22-29 SU (43%) and 34-16-1 ATS good for 68% winning bets over the past 7 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on road dogs facing a divisional foe for the second time in the same season. In the first matchup, our dog gained 6 or more yards after the completion. If our team is priced between a 3.5 and 9.5-poit underdog they have gone 12-15 SU and 18-9 ATS for 67% winners. If the game takes place in the playoffs, they have gone 5-3 SU and 7-1 ATS for 88% winning bets. There are far more bettors backing the Eagles than the Packers and this does raise concerns. Of the bets placed at DraftKings, 79% of them have been on the Birds and 71% of the handle. The line has been rock-solid at 4.5 points and only moved to 5.5 points when the official announcement came that Jalen Hurts was off the concussion protocol. At the Circa the betting flows are even more concerning with 29% of the tickets but 54% of the handle on the Packers. Green Bay Packers: The Packers finished the regular season with an 11-6 record, securing the No. 7 seed in the NFC. They have a balanced offense, averaging 24.8 points per game, and a solid defense, allowing 19.9 points per game. Philadelphia Eagles: The Eagles ended the regular season with a 14-3 record, winning the NFC East. They have a dominant offense, averaging 28.2 points per game, and a strong defense, allowing 17.2 points per game. Key Matchups Packers' Offense vs. Eagles' Defense: The Packers' offense, led by quarterback Jordan Love, will face a tough challenge against the Eagles' defense. Love has shown promise but will need to make accurate throws and avoid turnovers to keep the Eagles' defense at bay. Eagles' Offense vs. Packers' Defense: The Eagles' offense, led by quarterback Jalen Hurts, will look to exploit the Packers' defense. Hurts has been impressive this season, and his ability to make plays with both his arm and legs will be crucial. Running Game Battle: Both teams feature strong running backs. The Packers' Aaron Jones and the Eagles' Saquon Barkley will be key players in their respective offenses. The battle in the trenches will be crucial in determining which team can establish the run game. Turnover Battle: Turnovers can be game-changers in the playoffs. Both teams have been good at protecting the ball, but the team that can force turnovers and capitalize on them will have a significant advantage. Possible Packers' Upset Win For the Packers to pull off an upset, they will need to: Limit Turnovers: Avoid giving the Eagles extra possessions and scoring opportunities. Establish the Run Game: Utilize Aaron Jones to control the clock and keep the Eagles' offense off the field. Pressure Hurts: Generate a strong pass rush to disrupt Hurts' rhythm and force him into mistakes. Win the Field Position Battle: |
|||||||
01-12-25 | Oregon v. Penn State +2 | Top | 82-81 | Win | 100 | 5 h 44 m | Show |
Oregon vs Penn State The following college basketball betting algorithm has produced a 69-32 ATSand the requirements are: Bet on home underdogs including pick-em. The game is matchup of conference foes. Our dog is fresh off an upset win over a conference foe. Our dog has a winning record. The road team has won 80% or more of their games. |
|||||||
01-12-25 | Kings -3.5 v. Bulls | Top | 124-119 | Win | 100 | 4 h 25 m | Show |
Kings vs Bulls The following betting algorithm has produced a 374-142 SU (73%) SU record and a 316-189-11 ATS mark for 63% winning bets since 1997. The requirements are: Bet on a road team from the Western Conference avenging a same-season loss. That road team is favored between -1.5 and -11 points. The host is from the Eastern Conference. If the road team is playing on one or more days and the host is playing the second of back-to-back days, the road team’s record improves to 42-14 SU (75%) SU record and a 36-19-1 ATS mark for 65.5% winning bets since 1997. |
|||||||
01-12-25 | Bucks v. Knicks -4.5 | Top | 106-140 | Win | 100 | 4 h 55 m | Show |
Bucks vs Knicks The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 64-37 SU and a 65-35-21 ATS good for 65% winning bets over the past 6 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on any team that has failed to cover the spread by 48 or more points over their last seven games. That team has won between 60 and 75% of their games. The opponent has a winning record. If our team is the underdog or priced at pick-em, they have gone 22-20 SU and 29-13 ATS for 69% winning bets over the past 7 seasons. |
|||||||
01-12-25 | Broncos +8 v. Bills | Top | 7-31 | Loss | -107 | 2 h 41 m | Show |
Broncos vs Bills The following NFL betting algorithm has produced solid results with a 50-38 SU and a 54-31-3 ATS result for 64% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: Bet on a team that won and covered their previous game by double-digits. In that win, they had twice as many penalty yards as their opponent. If the opponent has a 50% or better win percentage, these teams improve to 21-22 SU and 28-13-2 ATS for 68% winning bets. If the game takes place in any of the playoff rounds, these teams have gone 17-13 SU and 21-8-1 ATS good for 72% winning bets since 2000. From the predictive model:My predictive model expects Denver to get more sacks than the Bills. Teams in the Wild Card round that sacked the opposing quarterback more than their QB was sacked and are priced as rod dogs, have gone 18-16 SU and 25-9 ATS good for 74% winning bets. If in this situation, our dog recorded three or sacks saw their teams go 16-11 SU and 21-6 ATS good for 78% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-11-25 | Steelers +9.5 v. Ravens | Top | 14-28 | Loss | -105 | 9 h 50 m | Show |
Pittsburgh vs Baltimore 8-Unit bet on the Steelers +9.5 points and sprinkle no more than a unit on the money line. This edition of the NFL playoffs is expected to be some of the most exciting games in many seasons featuring numerous lead changes and game winning drives in the last 2 minutes. This is a game in which the team we are betting on, the Steelers, is given no chance at all by the betting markets. Upon a deeper review, we learn that divisional foes facing each other for the third time in the same season have gone 3-3 SU and 5-1 ATS for 83% winning bets since 2013. When these teams have been priced as the dog, they have gone 4-0 ATS, so that is quite impressive even though it is a small sample size. Key Matchups for the Steelers Steelers' Defense vs. Lamar Jackson: The Steelers' defense will need to contain Ravens' quarterback Lamar Jackson, who has been exceptional this season with 4,000 passing yards and 900 rushing yards. If the Steelers can pressure Jackson and limit his mobility, they have a better chance of controlling the game. Steelers' Offensive Line vs. Ravens' Pass Rush: The Steelers' offensive line must protect quarterback Russell Wilson and give him time to make plays. The Ravens' pass rush, led by Kyle Van Noy with 12.5 sacks, will be a significant challenge1. Steelers' Receivers vs. Ravens' Secondary: Wide receivers George Pickens and Pat Freiermuth will need to step up and make big plays against the Ravens' secondary, which includes standout cornerback Marlon Humphrey. If the Steelers' receivers can get open and make catches, it will be crucial for their offensive success. |
|||||||
01-11-25 | Oklahoma v. Georgia -6.5 | 62-72 | Win | 100 | 7 h 52 m | Show | |
No. 17 Oklahoma Vs Georgia The following college basketball betting algorithm has gone 8-11 SU, but 13-5 ATS for 72% winning bets over the past 5 seasons. The requirements are: Bet home teams that are not ranked. The home team is allowing 32% or worse shooting from beyond the arc. The road team has played three consecutive games shooting 47% or better from the field. The road team is shooting 36.5% or better from beyond the arc. The road team is ranked but not ranked in the top 10. |
|||||||
01-10-25 | Sharks v. Utah Hockey Club -1.5 | Top | 1-2 | Loss | -100 | 3 h 15 m | Show |
Hockey Club vs Sharks Supporting this bet on the Hockey Club is the following algorithm that has gone 68-36 for 65% winning bets and 67-37 on the puck line that has averaged a 152-wager resulting in a highly profitable 36% ROi and a $54,800 profit for the Dime Bettor and a $2,740 profit for the $50 per game bettor.The requirements are: Bet on home teams using the money line. The home team is coming off a humiliating home loss by three or more goals to a divisional rival. The game takes place in January. If the total in our game is priced at 6.5 or more goals, these teams have gone 28-14 averaging a 155-wager using the puck line resulting in a 52% ROI and a $11,660 profit for the Dime Bettor. |
|||||||
01-10-25 | Thunder -4 v. Knicks | Top | 126-101 | Win | 100 | 2 h 47 m | Show |
Thunder vs Knicks The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 40-13 record and a 35-17 ATS record good 67% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on road favorites priced between 3.5 and 8.5 points. They saw their previous game play Over the total by 18 more points. The opponent has seen their last 10 games combine to play Over the total by 48 or more points. |
|||||||
01-10-25 | Warriors +11.5 v. Pacers | Top | 96-108 | Loss | -110 | 1 h 17 m | Show |
Warriors vs Pacers The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 59-73 record and 83-46-3 ATS record good 64.3% winning bets over the past six seasons. The requirements are: Bet on road dogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. Our dog is playing on back-to-back nights. The total is 225 or more points. Both teams have posted a scoring differential between –3 and +3 PPG. The opponent scored 120 or more points in their previous game. |
|||||||
01-10-25 | Bucks v. Magic +7 | Top | 109-106 | Win | 100 | 1 h 17 m | Show |
Bucks vs Magic The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 128-190 record and 189-126-3 ATS record good 60% winning bets over the past six seasons. The requirements are: Bet on underdogs priced between 3.5 and 7.5 points. Facing a team that scored 120 or more points in each of their last two games. If the foe is allowing 47.5% or worse shooting, then our team has gone on to a 38-32 SU and 44-25-1 ATS record good for 64% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-09-25 | Pacific +15.5 v. Washington State | Top | 95-94 | Win | 100 | 8 h 1 m | Show |
Pacific vs Washington State The following College Basketball betting system has produced a 6-62 SU record but a highly profitable 41-27 ATS good for 60% winning bets since 2010. The requirements are: Bet on double-digit road dogs. They are coming off a loss by 15 or more points and were favored. They are playing on four or more days of rest. If they are playing against a non-conference foe, their record improves to 23-14 ATS for 62% winning bets. If our dog is priced between 13 and 19.5 points, they have gone 13-6 ATS for 68.4% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-09-25 | Notre Dame v. Penn State +2.5 | Top | 27-24 | Loss | -109 | 77 h 19 m | Show |
Date: Thursday, January 9, 2025 This line is going to trend in favor of Notre Dame based on the current market conditions. So, if you are getting this pick on Tuesday or Wednesday, I would recommend waiting to see if the line trends higher to as high as 2.5 or even 3.5 points. The line may not move either, so betting 50% preflop and then look to add the remaining 50% a few hours ahead of the kick-off is a solid strategy. Live Betting Strategies: Another option is to bet 75% of your 10-unit amount preflop and then look to add 25% more with PSU priced as a 5.5-point underdog during the first half of action OR if Notre Dame scored a TD first to make the score 7-0 or even 10-0 if ND made a field goal as the first score of the game. PSU has had a season, which they start out slow in the first quarter and then suddenly kick it into top gear. The following College Football Betting Algorithm has produced a 42-30 SU (58%) and 38-23-1 ATS record good for 68% winning bets over the past 45 years or since 1980. The requirements are: The game occurs in the postseason. Our team is priced between pick-em and a 6.5-point underdog. The opponent has covered the spread in each of their last four games. If the opponent has covered the spread nine or more of their last 10 games, our dogs have gone a highly profitable 10-5 SU and 11-4 ATS good for 73% winning bets. he stage is set for an epic showdown as the No. 6 Penn State Nittany Lions take on the No. 7 Notre Dame Fighting Irish in the Orange Bowl on January 9, 2025. This highly anticipated matchup will determine who advances to the national championship game. Team Statistics Penn State Nittany Lions: Record: 13-2 Points Per Game: 33.7 Points Against: 15.8 Leading Rusher: Kaytron Allen (1,026 yards) Leading Receiver: Tyler Warren (1,158 yards) Leading Tackler: Jaylen Reed (92 tackles) Sacks: Abdul Carter (11 sacks) Notre Dame Fighting Irish: Record: 13-1 Points Per Game: 38.8 Points Against: 13.8 Leading Rusher: Jeremiyah Love (1,057 yards) Leading Receiver: Beaux Collins (445 yards) Leading Tackler: Jack Kiser (69 tackles) Sacks: Xavier Watts (6 interceptions, 1 forced fumble) Key Matchups Rushing Attack: Both teams boast elite rushing attacks, with Penn State led by Kaytron Allen and Nicholas Singleton, and Notre Dame by Jeremiyah Love and dual-threat quarterback Riley Leonard. Defensive Strength: Penn State's defense, anchored by Abdul Carter, will face a tough challenge against Notre Dame's strong rushing attack. Injuries: Notre Dame has been dealing with injuries, including the loss of star defensive lineman Rylie Mills and cornerback Benjamin Morrison. Penn State will hope for the return of Abdul Carter, who is questionable with an arm injury. From the Predictive Model: My predictive model expects Penn State to gain more rushing yards, have more time of possession and contain the ND passing attack to less than 58% completions. Under head coach James Franklin, Penn State is 37-3 SU (93%) and 33-5-2 ATS for 87% winning bets that have covered the spread by an average 10.26 PPG when they have met or exceeded these performance measures. |
|||||||
01-09-25 | Wolves -5.5 v. Magic | Top | 104-89 | Win | 100 | 6 h 41 m | Show |
Wolves vs Magic 8-unit bet on the Wolves priced as 5.5-point favorites. The following betting algorithm has produced a 374-142 SU (73%) SU record and a 316-189-11 ATS mark for 63% winning bets since 1997. The requirements are: Bet on a road team from the Western Conference avenging a same-season loss. That road team is favored between -1.5 and -11 points. The host is from the Eastern Conference. If the road team is playing on one or more days and the host is playing the second of back-to-back days, the road team’s record improves to 42-14 SU (75%) SU record and a 36-19-1 ATS mark for 65.5% winning bets since 1997. |
|||||||
01-08-25 | Air Force +19.5 v. San Diego State | 38-67 | Loss | -108 | 7 h 59 m | Show | |
Air Force vs San Diego State The following college basketball betting algorithm has produced a 5-46 SY+U and a highly profitable 36-15 ATS record good for 71% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: Bet on dogs priced at 13.5 or more points. That dog has lost three consecutive games against conference opponents. The dog is playing on three or more days of rest. The favorite is coming off a road upset win. |
|||||||
01-08-25 | Spurs +5 v. Bucks | Top | 105-121 | Loss | -105 | 6 h 7 m | Show |
Spurs vsBucks The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 59-73 record and 83-46-3 ATS record good 64.3% winning bets over the past six seasons. The requirements are: Bet on road dogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. The total is 225 or more points. Both teams have posted a scoring differential between –3 and +3 PPG. The opponent scored 120 or more points in their previous game. |
|||||||
01-08-25 | Raptors +12.5 v. Knicks | Top | 98-112 | Loss | -108 | 4 h 7 m | Show |
Raptors vs Knicks The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 13-28 SU record (28%) and a 29-11-1 ATS marl good for 73% winning bets since 2017. Bet on road underdogs priced between 7 and 14 points. They are coming off a home loss by 20 or more points. They lost the previous meeting to the current opponent by double-digits. If a divisional matchup, these dogs play hard and have earned a 5-9 SU and 11-3 ATS record good for 79% winning bets since 2017. |
|||||||
01-08-25 | Western Carolina v. Wofford -12 | 69-77 | Loss | -115 | 3 h 30 m | Show | |
Western Carolina vs Wofford The following College Basketball betting system has produced a 36-9 SU and 30-15 ATS record good for 67% winning bets since 2020. The requirements are: Bet on any favorite. That favorite is coming off a win by three or fewer points. The opponent has allowed 85 or more points in each of their last two games. Ifthe total is less than 150 points, these favorites have gone 24-6 SU and 21-9 ATS for 70% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-07-25 | Golden Knights v. Sharks +1.5 | Top | 4-2 | Loss | -108 | 7 h 18 m | Show |
Sharks vs Knights Consider betting 5.5 units on the +1.5 puck line and 2.5-unit son the money line as a more conservative betting strategy. The following NHL betting algorithm has produced a 275-371 (43%) record but by averaging a 175-underdog bet has earned a 12% ROI and a $150,420 profit for the Dime Bettor and a $7,520 profit for the $50 per game bettor. Bet on dogs from 105 and higher. The opponent is playing their 5th game in their last 11 days. The opponent has won 15 or more of their previous 20 games. If our dog is playing on 2 days of rest and priced at 150 or great underdog has seen them soar to a highly profitable 28-35 SU record averaging a 198-wager resulting in a 34% ROI and a $32,440 profit for the Dime Bettor. |
|||||||
01-07-25 | Tennessee v. Florida -2 | Top | 43-73 | Win | 100 | 4 h 42 m | Show |
No. 1 Tennessee vs No. 8 Florida I like the money line a bit better than laying the points. The following College Basketball betting system has produced a 25-9 SU and 22-11-1 ATS record good for 67% winning bets since 2006. Bet on a ranked team in the most recent Top 25 poll. They are facing a foe ranked in the top five in the most recent poll. The top 25 ranked team mentioned in line item 1, is favored by 1.5 to 6 points. The game occurs withing the first 15 games of the season. If the matchup is two teams from the SEC conference, the road team is 8-0 SU and 7-0-1 ATS for 100% winning bets. Unefeated teams with a 14-0 or better mark and find themsleves priced as a dog have gone 11-30 SU and 17-24 ATS for 42% since 2008. Key Matchups Tennessee's Defense vs. Florida's Offense: The Volunteers have one of the best defenses in the nation, allowing only 55.9 points per game. They will need to contain Florida's high-scoring offense, led by Walter Clayton Jr. (18.3 PPG) and Alijah Martin (15.9 PPG)1. If Tennessee can limit Florida's scoring opportunities, they will have a significant advantage. Florida's Rebounding vs. Tennessee's Interior Defense: The Gators have a slight edge in rebounding, averaging 38.7 rebounds per game. They will need to dominate the boards, especially on the offensive end, to create second-chance scoring opportunities. Tennessee's interior defense, anchored by Igor Milicic Jr. (10.9 PPG, 10.2 RPG), will be crucial in preventing Florida from capitalizing on rebounds. Three-Point Shooting: Both teams have strong three-point shooting capabilities, but Florida will need to be more efficient from beyond the arc to keep pace with Tennessee's scoring. The Gators shot 48.3% from three-point range in their last game against Kentucky, but they will need to maintain that level of accuracy against the Volunteers' defense. |
|||||||
01-06-25 | Heat +4 v. Kings | Top | 118-123 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 45 m | Show |
Heat vs Kings Now that the Jimmy Butler toxicity running rampant in the locker room and the media outlets appears to be getting Jimmy out of my Miami, I think the team will be able to play a whole more focused and with fewer distractions. The advantage now is the market will price Heat games absent of Butler and will occasionally provide some exceptional value in the pricing. The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 59-73 record and 83-46-3 ATS record good 64.3% winning bets over the past six seasons. The requirements are: Bet on road dogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. The total is 225 or more points. Both teams have posted a scoring differential between –3 and +3 PPG. The opponent scored 120 or more points in their previous game. |
|||||||
01-06-25 | Clippers +2.5 v. Wolves | Top | 106-108 | Win | 100 | 6 h 45 m | Show |
Clippers vs Wolves The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 47-35 SU (56%) and 51-30-1 ATS record good for 63% winning bets since 1996. The requirements are: Bet on road teams priced between a 3.5-point favorite and 3.5-point underdog. That team is coming off a home win by 20 or more points. The opponent has scored 105 or more points five or more of their last 6 games. |
|||||||
01-06-25 | Spurs -3 v. Bulls | Top | 110-114 | Loss | -107 | 6 h 44 m | Show |
Spurs vs Bulls The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 37-77 SU record and a 74-39-1 ATS mark good for 65.5% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are: Bet on road teams that have lost the last three meetings to the current foe. That road team is coming off a double-digit home loss. If our team is priced between a 4-point dog and a 4-point favorite they have gone 16-4 SUATS for 80% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-06-25 | Mississippi Valley State +16.5 v. Alabama A&M | Top | 67-79 | Win | 100 | 6 h 37 m | Show |
Mississippi Valley State bs Alabama A&M The following College Basketball betting system has produced a 15-186 SU and 116-83-2ATS record good for 58% winning bets since 2009. Bet on a road double-digit underdog. That team lost their previous game by 15 or more points and were priced as the favorite. If our team is playing on 1 or 2 days of rest, they have gone 55-32 ATS for 63% winning bets. If they are priced as 15 or greater-point underdogs they have gone 25-12 ATS for 68% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-06-25 | Magic +12 v. Knicks | Top | 103-94 | Win | 100 | 5 h 15 m | Show |
Magic vs Knicks The following NBA betting algorithm has done very well posting a 25-28 SU and 34-19 ATS record for 64% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are: Bet on road teams avenging a same-season loss. That team is coming off an upset home loss. They were favored by 3.5 or more points in that loss. They lost that game by double-digits. If the total is priced at 220 or fewer points, these dogs have gone 16-12 SU and 20-8 ATS for 71.4% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-05-25 | Vikings v. Lions -3 | Top | 9-31 | Win | 102 | 10 h 34 m | Show |
Vikings vs Lions 8-Unit bet on the Lions priced as 2.5-point favorites. The following NFL betting algorithm has gone 41-17 SU (71%) and 38-18-2 ATS (68%) over the past 15seasons. The requirements are: Bet on a favorite that has won three of their last four games. The opponent has won 8 or more of their previous 10 games. If the game is a divisional game and our team won the first meeting, they have gone to a stellar 8-3 SUATS record for 73% winning bets. The stage is set for an epic showdown as the Minnesota Vikings take on the Detroit Lions in a battle for the NFC North title and the coveted #1 seed in the NFC playoffs. This game will be played at Ford Field on Sunday night, January 5, 2025, and promises to be one of the most thrilling regular-season finales in NFL history1. Advanced NextGen Team Statistics Minnesota Vikings: Passing Yards: Sam Darnold has thrown for 4153 yards, 35 touchdowns, and 12 interceptions. Rushing Yards: Aaron Jones leads with 1093 yards and 5 touchdowns. Receiving Yards: Justin Jefferson has racked up 1479 yards and 10 touchdowns. Detroit Lions: Passing Yards: Jared Goff has thrown for 4398 yards, 36 touchdowns, and 10 interceptions. Rushing Yards:Jahmyr Gibbs leads with 1273 yards and 13 touchdowns. Receiving Yards: Amon-Ra St. Brown has accumulated 1186 yards and 12 touchdowns. Star Players Minnesota Vikings: Sam Darnold (QB): Darnold has been a revelation this season, playing his best football and leading the Vikings to a 14-2 record. Justin Jefferson (WR): Jefferson has been a consistent threat, surpassing 120 yards in six of his last eight games against the Lions. Aaron Jones (RB): Jones has been a workhorse for the Vikings, contributing significantly to their ground game. Detroit Lions: Jared Goff (QB): Goff has been efficient and effective, leading the Lions to a 14-2 record. Amon-Ra St. Brown (WR): St. Brown has been a reliable target for Goff, with 109 receptions for 1186 yards and 12 touchdowns. Jahmyr Gibbs (RB): Gibbs has been a breakout star, leading the team in rushing yards and touchdowns. Matchups to Watch Vikings Offense vs. Lions Defense: The Lions have played the most man coverage this season, but Justin Jefferson has consistently found ways to beat them. With cornerback Carlton Davis out due to injury, Jefferson could have another big day4. Lions Offense vs. Vikings Defense: The Vikings' defense has been solid all season, but they will need to contain Jahmyr Gibbs and Amon-Ra St. Brown to limit the Lions' scoring opportunities4. Turnover Battle: Both teams have been relatively careful with the ball this season, but the team that can force turnovers and capitalize on them will have a significant advantage. The Stakes The winner of this game will secure the NFC North title and the #1 seed in the NFC playoffs, earning home-field advantage and a bye through the Wildcard Weekend. The loser will drop to the #5 seed and face a tough road ahead in the playoffs5. This game is not just about bragging rights; it's about positioning for a deep playoff run. Both teams have had remarkable seasons, and this final matchup will determine who gets the upper hand in the race for the Super Bowl. |
|||||||
01-05-25 | Jazz v. Magic -6 | Top | 105-92 | Loss | -109 | 8 h 58 m | Show |
Jazz vs Magic The following NBA betting algorithm has done very well posting a 113-42 SU and 103-49-3 ATS record for 68% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: Bet on home teams. That home team has allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games. The opponent is coming off a game in which they scored 120 or more points. If the opponent is coming off a loss, our home team soar to a highly profitable 18-4 SU and 17-5 ATS record for 77% winning bets over the past five seasons. Betting on teams that have allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games and now facing a foe that scored 120 or more points in their previous game have gone 132-103 SU (56%) and 134-97-4 ATS for 58% winning bets over the past five seasons. Now, if our team is playing at home, then the five-season record went 84-35 SU and 78-38-5 ATS (67.2%). Playing at home and being favored by not more than 8 points has produced a 39-8 SU record and a 32-13-2 ATS mark for 71% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-05-25 | Penguins v. Hurricanes -1.5 | Top | 3-4 | Loss | -100 | 7 h 25 m | Show |
Penguins vs Hurricanes Supporting this bet on the Hurricanes is the following algorithm that has gone 64-36 for 64% winning bets and has averaged a +112 wager and earned a highly profitable 29% ROI over the past six seasons. The requirements are: Bet on home teams using the money line. The home team is coming off a humiliating home loss by three or more goals to a divisional rival. The game takes place in January. If our team is favored by –175 or more on the money line has produced a 16-6 SU and 14-8 -1.5 puck line record for 65% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-05-25 | Chiefs +11.5 v. Broncos | Top | 0-38 | Loss | -112 | 6 h 38 m | Show |
Chiefs vs Broncos The following NFL betting algorithm has produced solid results with a 50-38 SU and a 54-31-3 ATS result for 64% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: Bet on a team that won and covered their previous game by double-digits. In that win, they had twice as many penalty yards as their opponent. If the opponent has a 50% or better win percentage, these teams improve to 24-25 SU and 32-15-2 ATS for 68% winning bets. If the opponent is the favorite in this game, they have gone a highly profitable 15-3 SUATS for 83% winning bets. If the total is fewer than 40 points, these dogs have gone 7-3 SU and 7-2-1 ATS for 78% winning bets over the past 6 seasons. Also, there have been 14 games, in which the favorite was priced at 20 or more points. Those favorites have gone 14-0 SU, but a money-burning 4-10 ATS for 29% winning bets. Favorites of 17.5 or more points have gone 25-1 SU and 10-16 ATS for 38% winning bets. The lone SU loss occurred in week 14 of the 1995 season when the Cowboys were priced as a 17.5-point favorite and lost 24-17 to the Commanders. |
|||||||
01-05-25 | Kansas -4.5 v. UCF | Top | 99-48 | Win | 100 | 5 h 19 m | Show |
Kansas vs Central Florida The following College Basketball betting system has produced a 19-6 SU and 17-7-1 ATS record good for 71% winning bets since 2010. The requirements are: Bet on road favorites priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. The road favorite is coming off a loss by 5 or fewer points. The dog scored and allowed 80 or more points in their previous game. The opponent averages 77 or more PPG. |
|||||||
01-05-25 | Panthers +9 v. Falcons | Top | 44-38 | Win | 100 | 2 h 17 m | Show |
Panthers vs Falcons This NFL betting algorithm has gone 36-35 SU (43%) and 50-20-1 ATS good for 71.4% winning bets over the past 15 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on a team that has failed to cover the spread by 33 or more points spanning their previous five games. The opponent has seen their last three games play Over the total by 33 or more points. This NFL betting algorithm has gone 54-97-1 SU (36%) and 97-51-4 ATS good for 65.5% winning bets over the past 15 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on dogs priced between 3.5 and 10 points. The dog is getting outscored by an average of 5 or more points in the first half of action. The dog scored 14 or fewer points in their previous game. |
|||||||
01-04-25 | Hawks v. Clippers -7 | Top | 105-131 | Win | 100 | 10 h 8 m | Show |
Hawks vs Clippers The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 60-16 SU and 51-24-1 ATS record good for 68% winning bets over the past 7 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on favorites priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. They are on a two or more-game ATS losing streak. They have won 50 to 60% of their games. The opponent has a winning record. |
|||||||
01-04-25 | Michigan -5 v. USC | Top | 85-74 | Win | 100 | 7 h 30 m | Show |
Michigan vs USC The following College Basketball betting system has produced a 26-5 SU and 22-9 ATS record good for 71% winning bets since 2018. The requirements are: Bet on favorites priced between 2.5 and 7.5 points. The underdog is coming off a blowout win by 30 or more points. The favorite has scored 75 or more points in five consecutive games. If the total is 155 or fewer points, these favorites have gone 25-6 SU and 22-9 ATS good for 71% winning bets. |
|||||||
01-04-25 | Bengals v. Steelers +2.5 | Top | 19-17 | Win | 100 | 7 h 27 m | Show |
Bengals vs Steelers The following NFL betting algorithm has produced solid results with a 50-38 SU and a 54-31-3 ATS result for 64% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: Bet on divisional dogs priced between 2.5 and 7.5 points. The game is a divisional showdown. The dog won each of the last two meetings with the current foe. The foe is coming off a non-divisional game. The Cincinnati Bengals and Pittsburgh Steelers are set to clash in a high-stakes AFC North showdown. According to NextGen Stats, Bengals running back Chase Brown has an impressive average time behind the line of scrimmage of 2.61 seconds, the quickest in the league. On the other hand, Steelers tight end Pat Freiermuth boasts a catch rate of 85.1%, the best among all qualifying tight ends and receivers. Star Players Cincinnati Bengals: Joe Burrow: Leading the NFL in both passing yards and touchdown passes, Burrow has thrown for 250 yards and three touchdowns in eight straight games. Ja'Marr Chase: Chase is one game away from becoming the fifth receiver since the merger to win the "triple crown." He leads the league with 16 receiving touchdowns. Tee Higgins: Higgins has caught a career-high 10 touchdowns this year, despite missing five games due to injury. Pittsburgh Steelers: Russell Wilson: The Steelers' quarterback has been a key player, especially in recent games. T.J. Watt: The perennial All-Pro linebacker has been a disruptive force, although he has failed to get a sack in three of the past four games. George Pickens: The wide receiver needs 100 more yards to reach 1,000 for the season. Key Matchups Steelers Secondary vs. Bengals WRs: The Steelers' secondary will be tested by the dynamic duo of Ja'Marr Chase and Tee Higgins. In their last meeting, Chase and Higgins combined for 11 receptions, 155 yards, and two touchdowns. T.J. Watt vs. Joe Burrow: Watt's ability to pressure Burrow will be crucial. In their last matchup, Watt dropped Burrow twice and forced a fumble. Steelers Run Defense vs. Bengals RB Chase Brown: If Brown plays, his quickness behind the line of scrimmage will be a challenge for the Steelers' run defense. Playoff Seedings The outcome of this game will have significant implications for playoff seedings: Steelers: If Pittsburgh wins and Baltimore loses earlier in the day, the Steelers will clinch the AFC North. If they win but Baltimore wins, Pittsburgh will secure the No. 5 seed1. Bengals: Cincinnati needs to win and needs losses by the Broncos and Dolphins to grab the AFC's seventh and final playoff spot. |
|||||||
01-04-25 | 76ers -7 v. Nets | 123-94 | Win | 100 | 6 h 38 m | Show | |
76ers vs Nets The following betting algorithm has produced a 52-8 SU record and a 45-14-1 ATS mark for 76% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are: Bet on road favorites. The opponent is coming off a road win priced as a dog. The favorite defeated the current opponent by double-digits in a same-season previous game. |
|||||||
01-04-25 | Oklahoma v. Alabama -13 | Top | 79-107 | Win | 100 | 5 h 29 m | Show |
Oklahoma vs Alabama The following College Basketball betting system has produced a 33-11 ATS record good for 75% winning bets since 2018. The requirements are: Bet on double-digit favorites. The favorite allows between 40 and 42.5% shooting. The opponent has shot 47.5% or better for the season. The opponent has shot 47% or better in each of their last four games. |
|||||||
01-04-25 | Vanderbilt -2 v. LSU | Top | 80-72 | Win | 100 | 4 h 10 m | Show |
Vanderbilt vs LSU The following College Basketball betting system has produced a 26-5 SU and 22-9 ATS record good for 71% winning bets since 2018. The requirements are: Bet on favorites priced between 2.5 and 7.5 points. The underdog is coming off a blowout win by 30 or more points. The favorite has scored 75 or more points in five consecutive games. |
|||||||
01-02-25 | Blazers +9 v. Lakers | Top | 106-114 | Win | 100 | 9 h 39 m | Show |
Blazers vs Lakers The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 37-77 SU record and a 74-39-1 ATS mark good for 65.5% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are: Bet on road teams that have lost the last threemeetings to the current foe. That road team is coming off a double-digit home loss. If our road team is priced as a double-digit underdog, they have gone 36-15-1 ATS for 71% winning bets and if our dog is playing with two days or more of rest, they have gone 9-1-1 ATS for 89% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. |
|||||||
01-02-25 | Memphis v. Florida Atlantic +3.5 | Top | 90-62 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 60 m | Show |
Memphis vs Florida Atlantic The following NCAA betting algorithm has gone 40-26 SU (61%) and 45-17 ATS (73%) since 2019. The requirements needed for this a betting opportunity to be validated is as follows: Bet on teams with 7 or more days of rest. That team is coming off a horrid loss by 15 or more points. They were priced as the favorite. If these dogs have had 10 or more days of rest, they have gone 14-9 SU (61%) and 17-4 ATS for 81% winning bets since 2019. FAU has not played a game over the past 11 days. |
|||||||
12-31-24 | Morehead State v. Southern Indiana | Top | 70-68 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 22 m | Show |
Southern Indiana Vs Morehead State The following NCAA betting algorithm has gone 33-24 SU (58%) and 40-16 ATS (71.4%) since 2019. The requirements needed for this a betting opportunity to be validated is as follows: Bet on teams with 7 or more days of rest. That team is coming off a horrid loss by 15 or more points. They were priced as the favorite. If these dogs have had 9 or more days of rest, they have gone 20-15 SU (57%) and 25-8 ATS for 76% winning bets since 2019. |
|||||||
12-31-24 | Penn State -11 v. Boise State | Top | 31-14 | Win | 100 | 8 h 47 m | Show |
Penn State vs Boise State Penn State gas started slowly in nearly all their games this season. They fall behind early and then dominate in the second half. IN games this season in which they were tied or trailed at the end of the first quarter, they rallied to an 8-1 SU record but just 3-6 ATS. They are 5-2 SU and 1-6 ATS based on the closing line when they have been tied or trailed at the half. Penn State outscored their foes by 124 points in the second half in all 14 games and by 86 points in the games in which they were tied or trailed after the first quarter. Live Betting Strategy: I am suggesting a preflop bet of between 60 and 80% of your 8-Unit bet amount and then look for Boise to get an early lead and then add the remaining amount on Penn State. The downside to this strategy is obviously if Penn State scores first and never trail. I suggest adding the remaining Penn State bet if Penn State’s defense holds Boise State’s offense to three or fewer first downs in their first two possessions and did not score any points. That price may be around 14.5 points in a tied game early in the first quarter, but well worth the look knowing Boise State is struggling to move the chains on offense given their terrific ground attack led by their running back Jeanty, who rushed for a historic 2,652 yards including 29 TDs. The following NCAAF sports betting algorithm that has gone 36-5 SU (88%) SU and 29-11-1 ATS for 73% winning bets since 2007. The requirements are: Bet on favorites priced between a 7.5 and 12.5-point favorite. The matchup is in a bowl game. The total is fewer than 60 points. The favorite has won the same or fewer games than the opponent. Double-digit favorites in the postseason that are ranked lower (better team) than the opponent, have gone 40-6 SU (87%) and 29-17 ATS for 63% winning bets since 2007. In the postseason, teams that forced 8 or more turnovers than the opponent’s defense and favored by double-digits have gone 13-1 SU and 10-4 ATS for 71.4% winning bets. Penn State's defense has been stellar this season, allowing just 253 yards per game and recording 33 sacks. They've also forced 18 turnovers, including three pick-sixes in their last game against SMU3. On the offensive side, Penn State averages 35 points per game, with quarterback Drew Allar completing 65% of his passes for 3,200 yards and 28 touchdowns3. Boise State, on the other hand, has a strong rushing attack led by Heisman Trophy finalist Ashton Jeanty. Jeanty has rushed for 1,882 yards after contact, averaging 4.8 yards per carry and forcing a missed tackle rate of 37.1%1. Quarterback Maddux Madsen has been efficient with a 62% completion rate and 22 touchdowns to just three interceptions. Key matchups to watch: Penn State's Defense vs. Ashton Jeanty: Jeanty is a beast, but Penn State's defense has been dominant, especially against the run. If they can contain Jeanty, it will be a long night for Boise State. Drew Allar vs. Boise State's Secondary: Allar has been accurate and has a strong arm, but Boise State's secondary has only allowed 200 passing yards per game. This will be a battle of Allar's arm against Boise State's coverage schemes. In conclusion, while Boise State has a strong team, Penn State's overall talent and depth, combined with their dominant defense, give them the edge to win this game by more than 17 points. Don't be surprised if we see a blowout in favor of the Nittany Lions. From the Predictive Model: My model is expecting PSU to score at least 28 points and have the same or fewer turnovers. IN past games dating back to the start of the 2015 season, Penn State is 63-1 SU and 49-11-4 ATS good for 82% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The mode also expects Penn State to score 28 or more points, have more rushing yards, and have a minimum of 5-minute advantage in time-of-possession. In past games since 2015, Penn State is 43-1 SU and 37-6-1 ATS good for 86% winning bets when meeting or exceeding these performance measures. Boise State is just 5-16 SU and 4-15-2 ATS for 21% winning tickets when they have allowed 28 or more points and had fewer rushing yards than their opponent in games played since 2015. |
|||||||
12-31-24 | Baylor -3.5 v. LSU | Top | 31-44 | Loss | -108 | 3 h 29 m | Show |
Baylor vs LSU The following NCAAF Betting Algorithm has produced exceptional results with a 48-25 SU and 46-23-5 ATS record for 67% winning bets since 1985. The requirements are: Bet on teams priced between the 3’s. That team is averaging 34 or more PPG. Their defense has allowed 17 or fewer points in each of their two previous games. The opponent allows an average of 21 to 28 PPG. |
|||||||
12-31-24 | Bucks -1 v. Pacers | 120-112 | Win | 100 | 3 h 4 m | Show | |
Bucks vs Pacers The following betting algorithm has produced a 20-70 (22%) SU record and a 30-59-1 ATS mark for 34% winning bets over the past 7 (2018) seasons. The requirements are: Bet against home dogs. The dog is coming off an upset win on the road. The dog lost the last meeting with the current opponent by double-digits. If the dog is priced at 4.5 or fewer points, they have done poorly posting a 98-27 SU (25%) and 12-24 ATS record for 33% winning bets. Further, if the total is 225 or more points, these home pups have gone 2-14 SU and 3-13 ATS for just 19% winning bets. Bet the Bucks. |
|||||||
12-31-24 | Louisville v. Washington +3 | Top | 35-34 | Win | 100 | 118 h 11 m | Show |
Washington vs Louisville The following NCAAF betting algorithm has produced a 15-10 SU and 17-8 ATS for 68% winning bets over the past 20 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on teams with a new coach from the previous season. The game is a bowl game. The team has won fewer games than the opponent. The team’s offensive yards per point ratio is 15 or more. |
|||||||
12-31-24 | Brown +25.5 v. Kentucky | Top | 54-88 | Loss | -110 | 2 h 52 m | Show |
Brown vs Kentucky The following NCAA betting algorithm has gone 33-24 SU (58%) and 40-16 ATS (71.4%) since 2019. The requirements needed for this a betting opportunity to be validated is as follows: Bet on teams with 7 or more days of rest. That team is coming off a horrid loss by 15 or more points. They were priced as the favorite. |
|||||||
12-30-24 | Lions v. 49ers +3.5 | Top | 40-34 | Loss | -110 | 8 h 22 m | Show |
Lions vs 49ers (MNF) This NFL betting algorithm has gone 36-35 SU (43%) and 50-20-1 ATS good for 71.4% winning bets over the past 15 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on a team that has failed to cover the spread by 33 or more points spanning their previous five games. The opponent has seen their last three games play Over the total by 33 or more points. The following NFL betting algorithm has produced a 23-37 SU and 36-23-1 ATS record good for 61% winning bets since 1989. The requirements needed for an active betting opportunity are as follows: Bet on any team facing a foe that has won 83% or more of their games. The game occurs from week 12 on out. They are priced as 1.5 to 7.5-point underdogs. If the game is a matchup of conference foes, they have gone on to a stellar 18-24 SU and 28-13-1 ATS mark good for 68% winning bets. If the game is aq conference matchup and the total is 50 or more points has seen these dogs go 4-7 SU, but 8-2-1 ATS for 80% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. |
|||||||
12-30-24 | Iowa +2.5 v. Missouri | Top | 24-27 | Loss | -109 | 3 h 51 m | Show |
Iowa vs Missouri (Monday, December 30) The following NCAAF betting algorithm has produced a 24-28 SU and 33-16-3 ATS for 67.3% winning bets over the past 5 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on underdogs priced from pick-em to 6 points. They are coming off an upset win. They are facing a foe that has covered the spread in four consecutive games. They game is played on a neutral field. If the dog has won fewer games than the opponent, these dogs soar to an 18-13 SU (68%) and 22-9 ATS record good for 71% winning bets sine 1981. If the current game is a bowl game, the dog has gone 15-10 SU and 18-7 ATS for 72% winning bets since 1981. If our dog has won between 6 and 8 games, they have gone a highly impressive 15-8 SU and 18-5 ATS for 78.3% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-29-24 | Grizzlies +7 v. Thunder | Top | 106-130 | Loss | -115 | 7 h 20 m | Show |
Grizzlies vs Thunder The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 31-12 SU and 29-14 ATS mark for 67.4% winning bets since 2004. The requirements are: Bet on road teams. The road team is coming off a game they never trailed. The road team has at least one day of rest, The host is playing the second of back-to-back games. |
|||||||
12-29-24 | Packers +1 v. Vikings | Top | 25-27 | Loss | -108 | 5 h 31 m | Show |
Packers vs Vikings The following NFL betting algorithm has produced a 41-16 SU and 38-17-2 ATS good for 69% winning bets over the past 15 seasons. The requirement are: Bet on any favorite. Our team has won three of their last four games. The opponent has won 8 or more of their last 10 games. The Packers are sitting at 11-4, while the Vikings are at an impressive 13-2. Both teams have been on fire this season, but the Vikings have a slight edge in the standings. Now, let's talk about the advanced team statistics, or NexGen Stats. The Packers have a turnover differential of +12, while the Vikings are at +10. Offensively, the Packers rank 4th in total yards, 4th in rushing yards, and 12th in passing yards. Defensively, they're 6th in total yards allowed,8th in rushing yards allowed, and 8th in passing yards allowed. On the other side, the Vikings rank 12th in total yards, 16th in rushing yards, and 8th in passing yards. Defensively, they're 15th in total yards allowed,2nd in rushing yards allowed, and 30th in passing yards allowed. When it comes to betting, the Packers have an against-the-spread record of 9-6, while the Vikings are at 10-4-1. The Over-Under records show the Packers at 7-7-1, and the Vikings at 9-6. Now, let's dive into the key matchups that could give the Packers the edge. First, we have Packers quarterback Jordan Love going up against the Vikings' defense. Love has been on a roll, throwing eight touchdowns and no interceptions over his past five games. His performance against the Vikings earlier this season was impressive, despite the loss, with 389 yards and four touchdowns. Another key matchup is Packers running back Aaron Jones facing his former team. Jones has been a powerhouse, with 440 total yards and four touchdowns from scrimmage over his last five games. He'll be looking to make a statement against the Vikings' defense. Lastly, the Packers' defense will need to step up, especially with cornerback Jaire Alexander out due to injury. However, if they can contain Vikings quarterback Sam Darnold and limit his passing game, they have a good chance of pulling off the upset. |
|||||||
12-29-24 | Nets +7 v. Magic | 101-102 | Win | 100 | 4 h 49 m | Show | |
Nets vs Magic The following betting algorithm has produced a 22-43 SU (34%) SU record and a 41-23-1 ATS mark for 64% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: Bet on a road underdog that has won 25 to 40% of their games. That dog is priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. That dog has seen the total play Under by 48 or more points spanning their previous 10 games. If the game has a total of 220 or fewer points, these road dogs have produced a highly profitable 23-8-1 ATS for 74% winning bets |
|||||||
12-29-24 | Panthers +10 v. Bucs | 14-48 | Loss | -105 | 1 h 7 m | Show | |
Panthers vs Bucs The following NFL betting algorithm has produced a 35-53 SU and 61-26-1 ATS good for 70% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirement are: Bet on teams allowing an average of 28 or more points per game. The road dog is priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. The game features two same-conference teams. If the game occurs from week 10 on out to the end of the season, these dogs have shredded their opponents going 11-12 SU and 19-3-1 ATS good for 86% winning bets since 2015. Mayfield throws the 4th most passes to receivers are behind the line of scrimmage. Carolina allows the second most passing yards on this type of easy to complete passes. However, you will see the Carolia linebackers shadowing every RB in the Bucs backfield to take that play away from the Bucs. The Panthers defense has been playing much better in the second half of the season and they do have reason to try and wreck the plans for the Bucs to win the Division. A prop bet worth considering is receptions by the Bucs running backs (not receiving yards). The game plan will still include Mayfield throwing balls behind the line of scrimmage, but those plays are expected to limited with few yards after the catch. So, betting OVER receptions for Rachaad White and bucky Irving look good for 0.5 to 1.0 units each. |
|||||||
12-29-24 | Cowboys +7.5 v. Eagles | Top | 7-41 | Loss | -110 | 1 h 5 m | Show |
Cowboys vs Eagles Here is an NFL betting algorithm that has gone 17-17 SU (50%) and 25-7-2 ATS good for 78% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on underdogs from week 11 on out. That dog won their two previous games priced as the underdog. The dog has won 40 to 49% of their games. If the game is a divisional matchup, these dogs have gone 7-6 SU and 10-2-1 ATS good for 83% winning bets. The Cowboys suffered the worst home loss in franchise history to their divisional rival Eagles this year and head coach McCarthy has not lost the locker room as evidenced by their improved plays and wins priced as underdogs. So, to assume that the Eagles are just going to show up and blow these guys out is not a wise or even informed decision. Yes, the Eagles may win the game but to cover thsi spread is going to be a tall task based on the analytics. |
|||||||
12-28-24 | Bucks -3.5 v. Bulls | 111-116 | Loss | -109 | 10 h 32 m | Show | |
Bucks vs Bulls The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 33-22 and 36-17-2 ATS record good for 68% winning bets over the past 15seasons. The requirements are: Bet on a road team The host is coming off a game in which 40% or more of their total points came from beyond the arc. The total went Over the total by 30 or more points in the road team’s previous game. Both teams are playing on the same number of days of rest and not more than a single day of rest. |
|||||||
12-28-24 | Pacific +21 v. St. Mary's | Top | 60-70 | Win | 100 | 9 h 21 m | Show |
Pacific vs St. Mary’s The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 15-183 SU (8%) record and a 115-82-2 ATS record good for 59% winning bets since 2010. The requirements are: • Bet on double-digit road teams. That team is going off an upset loss by 15 or more points. If the total is between 135 and 145 points, these dogs have gone 38-23-1 ATS for 63% winning bets. If the dog is priced at 17 or more points, they have gone14-7 ATS for 67% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-28-24 | Broncos +3.5 v. Bengals | Top | 24-30 | Loss | -119 | 6 h 47 m | Show |
Broncos vs Bengals The following NFL betting algorithm has produced a 27-29 SU record and a 37-16-3 ATS mark good for 70% winning bets since 1989. The requirements for this rare and highly profitable system are: Bet on any team (Broncos) that has scored in 11 of their last 12 quarters. That team is priced as a 3 to 7.5-point dog. The opponent has gained 800 or more total yards over their last two games. The following NFL betting algorithm has produced a 52-44 SU record and a 59-34-3 ATS mark good for 63% winning bets since 2010. The requirements are: Bet on road teams priced between a 4.5-point favorite and a 4.5-point underdog. The road team defeated the current opponent in their previous game. The road team lost its game against the current opponent. The home team is coming off a home game. The road team is coming off road game. |
|||||||
12-28-24 | Iowa State v. Miami-FL -3.5 | Top | 42-41 | Loss | -109 | 48 h 43 m | Show |
Miami (FLA) vs Iowa State The following NCAAF betting algorithm has produced a 22-9 SU and 22-9 ATS for 71% winning bets over the past 15 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on favorites priced between 3.5 and 7.5 points. The game is a bowl game. Both teams average 30 or more PPG. The total is priced between 55 and 60 points. |
|||||||
12-28-24 | Chargers v. Patriots +6 | Top | 40-7 | Loss | -108 | 2 h 17 m | Show |
Chargers vs Patriots The following algorithm that has gone 5-15 SU (33%) SU and 14-6 ATS for 70% winning bets since 1989 or 36 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on home underdogs from week 14 on out. That dog won four or fewer games in the previous season. That dog has won 25% or fewer of their games this season. The opponent has won 55% or more of their games this season. If we delete the the fourth requirements and the opponent’s record does not matter has resulted in a 14-31 SU (31%) and a 30-15 ATS (67%) record since 1989. |
|||||||
12-28-24 | Connecticut v. North Carolina -2 | Top | 27-14 | Loss | -109 | 43 h 12 m | Show |
UNC vs Connecticut Bet on favorites priced between 3.5 and 7.5 points. The game is a bowl game. Both teams average 30 or more PPG. The total is priced between 55 and 60 points. |
|||||||
12-27-24 | Cavs v. Nuggets +3 | Top | 149-135 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 35 m | Show |
Cavs vs Nuggets The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 25-13 SU and 26-12 ATS mark for 68.4% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are: Bet on home underdogs priced between pick-em and four points. They are facing an opponent that is outscoring their opponents by 6 or more PPG. The opponent has played three straight games in which 220 or more points were scored in each one. The total is priced between 220 and 239.5 points. If the game features two teams from different conferences, they have gone 13-5 SUATS for 72% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-27-24 | Grizzlies -9 v. Pelicans | Top | 132-124 | Loss | -105 | 6 h 36 m | Show |
Grizzlies vs Pelicans The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 73-20 SU and 56-36-1 ATS record good for 61% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. Bet on favorites priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. The favorite is o the road. The favorite is coming off a game in which the total points went Over the posted total by 18 or more points. The opponent has played Over the total by 48 or more points over their past 10 games. If this game is a divisional showdown, our favorites have gone 16-2 SU and 15-3 ATS good for 83% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-26-24 | Arkansas State v. Bowling Green -10 | Top | 38-31 | Loss | -107 | 5 h 23 m | Show |
Bowling Green vs Arkansas State The following NCAAF sports betting algorithm that has gone 36-5 SU (88%) SU and 29-11-1 ATS for 73% winning bets since 2007. The requirements are: Bet on favorites priced between a 7.5 and 12.5-point favorite. The matchup is in a bowl game. The total is fewer than 60 points. The favorite has won the same or fewer games than the opponent. Both teams come into this game with identical 7-5 records, but the advanced stats tell a more detailed story. Bowling Green ranks 19th in points per game with 25.5, while Arkansas State sits at 108th with 24.0 points per game. Defensively, Bowling Green is even more impressive, allowing just 20.5 points per game, good for 21st in the nation, compared to Arkansas State's 32.4 points allowed per game. When it comes to advanced metrics, Bowling Green's defense shines even brighter. They rank 16th in the country in third-down defense, allowing conversions on just 33.11% of attempts. Arkansas State, on the other hand, struggles on third downs, converting just 38.41% of the time. Bowling Green's offense revolves around sixth-year senior quarterback Connor Bazelak, who ranks fourth among active quarterbacks in career passing yards. He led the MAC in completion percentage (67.1%) and adjusted yards per attempt (7.73) this season2. Bazelak has a 10:1 touchdown-to-interception ratio over his last seven games, and he'll be facing an Arkansas State defense that ranks 124th in yards per pass attempt allowed. |
|||||||
12-23-24 | Pistons v. Lakers -5.5 | Top | 117-114 | Loss | -105 | 11 h 41 m | Show |
Pistons vs Lakers The following NBA betting algorithm has done very well posting a 113-39 SU and 103-46-3 ATS record for 69% winning bets over the past 7 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on home teams. That home team has allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games. The opponent is coming off a game in which they scored 120 or more points. If the opponent is coming off a loss, our home team soar to a highly profitable 18-4 SU and 17-5 ATS record for 77% winning bets over the past 7 seasons. |
|||||||
12-23-24 | Saints v. Packers -14 | Top | 0-34 | Win | 100 | 9 h 7 m | Show |
Saints vs Packers Consider betting 75% of your 10-UNIT MAX Bet on the Packers preflop and then look to bet them at -11.5-points at any point during the first half of action only. The risk is that the Packers get out to a fast start and never trail by fewer than 13 points after getting a double-digit lead. It also implies we are winning the bet easily ATS. The following NFL betting algorithm has gone 40-4 for 91%and 28-14-2ATS for 67% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on double-digit favorites. That favorite has won 60% or more of their games. The opponent has won 40% or fewer of their games. The opponent is on a one or more-game losing streak. The game occurs from week 11 on out. If the two teams play in the same conference our big favorite has gone 28-1 SU and 21-7-1 ATS for 75% winning bets. The loan loss occurred in week 17 of the 2016 season when the Patriots went on the road and lost to the Dolphins 20-10 priced as a 10-point favorite. The Packers are sitting at 10-4, while the Saints are struggling at 5-9. Green Bay is 3-2 against the spread as a home favorite this season, and the Saints are 2-2 ATS as road dogs2. Now, let's talk advanced stats. According to NexGen Stats, the Packers are second in the NFL in Net Yards per Play with a +1.1 differential. They're also one of only three teams in the top eight in both EPA per play and opponent EPA per play2. On the other hand, the Saints have allowed the most yards after catch over expected, with opponents averaging 6.3 yards after the catch. When it comes to key matchups, the Packers' offense is firing on all cylinders. Quarterback Jordan Love has thrown for eight touchdowns and just one interception over his last five games. Receivers like Jayden Reed and Tucker Kraft have been making big plays, and running back Josh Jacobs is averaging a 50.6% rushing success rate. On the defensive side, the Packers are fourth in the NFL in opponent turnover rate and have yielded a score on the eighth-lowest share of opponent drives. The Saints, missing key players like Derek Carr and Alvin Kamara, will have rookie Spencer Rattler starting at quarterback1. Rattler has a 32% passing success rate and has been sacked on over 10% of his dropbacks. In summary, the Packers have the edge in nearly every aspect of the game, from offensive production to defensive efficiency. With the Saints missing key players and struggling on both sides of the ball, it's easy to see why the Packers are favored to win by more than 17 points as projected by the predictive model. The Predictive Model: My predictive model expects the Packers to score 27 or more points in this game and hold the Saints to 14 or fewer points and have the same or fewer turnovers as the Saints. In past games since 2021, the Packers are 92-2 SU and 84-10-2 ATS for 89% winning bets when scoring 27 or more points and having the same or fewer turnovers as their opponent. Over the same time span, the Packers are 69-1 SU and 64-4-2 ATS when allowing 15 or fewer points and having the same or fewer turnovers. |
|||||||
12-23-24 | Rockets -6.5 v. Hornets | 114-101 | Win | 100 | 7 h 11 m | Show | |
Rockets vs Hornets The following algorithm that has gone 59-24 (71%) SU and 53-29-1 ATS for 65% winning bets since 1995 or 30 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on a Western Conference roads team taking on an Eastern Conference team. The road team is favored up to an including –11 points. The road team lost the previous meeting to the opponent. The favorite is playing on back-to-back nights. The favorite has the better (higher) effective shooting and true shooting percentage. |
|||||||
12-23-24 | Celtics -10 v. Magic | 104-108 | Loss | -110 | 7 h 11 m | Show | |
Celtics vs Magic The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 29-3 SU record and 22-10 ATS record good for 69% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are: Bet on double-digit road favorites. Facing a host that saw the Over win by 20 or more points in their last game. If the total of the game is 220 or more points, these teams have gone 25-3 SU and 20-8 ATS good for 71.4% winning bets. If the opponent is coming off a win, our road favorites have gone 12-1 SU and 10-3 ATS for 77% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-22-24 | Nuggets -9 v. Pelicans | Top | 132-129 | Loss | -115 | 11 h 50 m | Show |
Nuggets vs Pelicans The following algorithm that has gone 257-60 (81%) SU and 191-119-7 ATS for 62% winning bets since 2004. The requirements are: Bet on road favorites between -5.5 and -10.5 points. Our road team has scored 5 or more points above the league average scoring level in their last three games. If the host is playing on back-to-back nights our road favorite soars to a highly profitable 45-7 (87%) SU and 36-16-1 ATS for 69% winning bets since 2004. |
|||||||
12-22-24 | Patriots +14 v. Bills | Top | 21-24 | Win | 100 | 8 h 1 m | Show |
Patriots vs Bills The following NFL betting algorithm has gone 20-23 SU (47%) and 31-12 ATS (72%) over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on underdogs including pick-em facing a divisional foe. In the last matchup our dog passed for at least 100 yards. Our dog is coming off a non-divisional game. Our dog lost that game by more than 7 points. Our dog had fewer than 20 first downs in that loss. |
|||||||
12-22-24 | Vikings v. Seahawks +3 | Top | 27-24 | Push | 0 | 8 h 41 m | Show |
Minnesota vs Seattle The Vikings have outperformed all expectations this season starting with their regular seasons wins total that was priced at 6.5 wins. They have won 12 games through 15 weeks of this season and challenging Detroit for the NFC North division crown and the top-seed in the NFC playoffs. However, previous teams that surpassed expectations by large margins in a wide range of statistical measures are prone to regression. This is the situation that the Vikings fid themselves in when they travel to Seattle to take on the Seahawks. The Vikings regular season wins total was priced at 6.5 wins. Having earned 12 wins to date they have exceeded this total by 5.5 wins with three games remaining in the regular season.Road favorites of 1.5 or more points that have exceeded their wins total by 3.5 or more games have gone 7-7 SU and 3-11 ATS for just 21.4% winning bets since 2010. If our juggernaut is coming off a divisional fray, they have gone just 2-7 ATS for 22.2%. If the team’s wins price was 6 or more wins, they have fallen to earth sporting a 2-11 ATS record for 15% winning bets. The last time this occurred was in week 17of the 2021 season when the Miami Dolphins traveled to Buffalo to take on their division rival Bills, were priced as 3.5-points, and were humiliated 56-26. The following NFL betting algorithm has produced a 32-41 SU and 51-22 ATS record good for 70% winning bets since 1989. The requirements needed for an active betting opportunity are as follows: Bet on underdogs. This favorite is coming off a three-game home stand. The game occurs from week 10 on out to the end of the season. If the favorite is on the road and won their last two games, our dogs have produced an outstanding 16-18 SU and 24-10 ATS record good for 71% winning bets. If the favorite, regardless of site location, has won their last 4 games has seen the dog feast to a highly profitable 13-12 SU and 20-5 ATS record good for 80% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-22-24 | Browns +9.5 v. Bengals | Top | 6-24 | Loss | -110 | 5 h 37 m | Show |
Browns vs Bengals The following NFL betting algorithm has produced solid results with a 22-30 SU and a 36-15-1 ATS result for 71% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: Bet on road dogs priced between 3 and 9.5 points. That team is coming off a loss and had three or more turnovers. The total is priced between 44.5 and 50 points. Our road dog played UNDER their team total in their last game. The following NFL betting algorithm has gone 20-23 SU (47%) and 31-12 ATS (72%) over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on underdogs including pick-em facing a divisional foe. In the last matchup our dog passed for at least 100 yards. Our dog is coming off a non-divisional game. Our dog lost that game by more than 7 points. Our dog had fewer than 20 first downs in that loss. |
|||||||
12-22-24 | Eagles v. Commanders +4.5 | Top | 33-36 | Win | 100 | 5 h 34 m | Show |
Eagles vs Commanders The following NFL betting algorithm has produced a 21-32 SU and 34-18-1 ATS record good for 65% winning bets since 1989. The requirements needed for an active betting opportunity are as follows: Bet on any team facing a foe that has won 83% or more of their games. The game occurs from week 12 on out. They are priced as 1.5 to 7.5-point underdogs. If the game is a divisional showdown, these teams have produced a highly profitable 8-9 SU and 14-2-1 ATS record good for 88% winning bets. From the Predictive Model: My predictive mode is expecting the Commanders to score 22 or more points, have two or fewer dropped passes. In past games in which the Commanders met or exceeded these performance measures has seen them go 9-1 SU and 8-2 ATS since 2020. In road games, the Eagles are 1-9 SUATS when allowing these performance measures in games played since 2020. Key Matchups for Commanders vs. Eagles Marshon Lattimore vs. A.J. Brown: Lattimore, recently acquired by the Commanders, will be tasked with covering Brown, who is coming off his best game in two months. Bobby Wagner vs. Saquon Barkley: Wagner will need to contain Barkley, who had a huge game in their last meeting with 146 yards and two touchdowns. Tyler Biadasz vs. Jalen Carter: Biadasz, the Commanders' center, must limit the impact of Carter, who was dominant in their previous matchup. |
|||||||
12-21-24 | Clippers +3.5 v. Mavs | Top | 97-113 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 0 m | Show |
Clippers vs Mavs The following NBA betting algorithm has earned a 36-18 SU (67%) and 35-16-3 ATS good for 69% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are: Bet on any team priced between a 3.5-point favorite and a 2.5-poit underdog. That team is coming off a win by 20 or more points. The opponent has scored 115 or more points in three consecutive games. |
|||||||
12-21-24 | Celtics -11.5 v. Bulls | Top | 123-98 | Win | 100 | 12 h 31 m | Show |
Celtics vs Bulls The following NBA betting algorithm has earned a 48-21 SU (70%) and 44-24-1 ATS good for 65% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: Bet on any team avenging a same-season home loss priced as a 7 or more-point favorite. That team is coming off an upset loss. The predictive model is projecting that the Celtics will score 125 or more points. In road games, the Celtics are 10-0 SUATS when coming off a loss, playing on the road, and scoring 125 or more points since 2021. |
|||||||
12-21-24 | Texans +3.5 v. Chiefs | Top | 19-27 | Loss | -115 | 4 h 18 m | Show |
Texans vs Chiefs The following NFL betting algorithm has produced a 21-32 SU and 34-18-1 ATS record good for 65% winning bets since 1989. The requirements needed for an active betting opportunity are as follows: Bet on any team facing a foe that has won 83% or more of their games. The game occurs from week 12 on out. They are priced as 1.5 to 7.5-point underdogs. If the game is a matchup of conference foes, they have gone on to a stellar 18-24 SU and 28-13-1 ATS mark good for 68% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-21-24 | SMU v. Penn State -8.5 | Top | 10-38 | Win | 100 | 20 h 60 m | Show |
SMU vs PSU The following NCAAF betting algorithm has produced a 21-3 SU and 17-7 ATS mark good for 71% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on favorites. That favorite scored 24 or more points in the first half of their last game. They are facing a foe that has scored 31 or more points in five consecutive games. Regardless of the market pricing our team as a favorite or dog, thsi system has gone 51-22-1 ATS for 70% winners over the past 10 seasons. If our team is priced as a favorite and playing in a bowl game or the CFP, they have gone 7-0 SU and 6-1 ATS over the past 10 seasons. One of the biggest battles will be between SMU's stout rushing defense and Penn State's dynamic duo of running backs, Kaytron Allen and Nicholas Singleton. SMU allows just 93.4 rushing yards per game, which is the lowest in program history2. Meanwhile, Allen and Singleton have been instrumental for Penn State, with Singleton rushing for 839 yards and Allen adding 822 yards. SMU has not had to face two elite running backs this season. Add in QB Drew Allar and the use of play action to free up TE Tyler Warren and you have a monumentally difficult offense to defend on every down. From the predictive model: My proprietary model expects PSU to score 34 or more points and have the same or fewer turnovers as SMU. In past games under Franklin, PSU is 38-1 SU and 38-4-2 ATS for 91% winning bets. SMU is 5-41 SU and 10-36-1 ATS when allowing 34 or more points and having the same or more committed turnovers since 2014 and 0-6 SUATS since 2021. |
|||||||
12-20-24 | Indiana +7.5 v. Notre Dame | Top | 17-27 | Loss | -115 | 104 h 47 m | Show |
Indiana vs Notre Dame I like a sprinkle of no more than 2-Units on the money line preflop. Also, holding that money line sprinkle to see if Notre Dame scores first or retakes the lead during the first half of action is preferred. The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 67-48 record and 68-46-1ATS record good 60% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on road teams. The road team scored 60 or more points in their previous game. They allowed 14 or fewer points in their previous game. If our road team scored 45 or more points in their previous game and the game is a bowl game, conference championship, or the college playoffs, they have gone an amazing 6-3 SU and 7-0-1 ATS for 100% winning bets since 2010. From the Predictive Model: My predictive model is expecting Indiana to score 27 or more points and have the same or fewer turnovers as Notre Dame. Indiana is 15-2 SU and 13-4 ATS good for 77% wining bets in games i which they scored 27 or more points and had the same or fewer turnovers since 2021. |
|||||||
12-20-24 | Bucks +9.5 v. Cavs | Top | 101-124 | Loss | -105 | 4 h 41 m | Show |
Bucks vs Cavaliers The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 16-50 SU record and a 43-21-2 ATS record good for 67% winning bets since 2021. The requirements are: Bet on dogs. The opening line priced our dog as the underdog and the line has since moved 4 or more points in our favor. The game number occurs from the 12th to the 41st game of the 82-game regular season. |
|||||||
12-19-24 | Nuggets -8.5 v. Blazers | 124-126 | Loss | -107 | 10 h 46 m | Show | |
Nuggets vs Blazers The following algorithm that has gone 268-64 (81%) SU and 196-129-7 ATS for 60.3% winning bets since 2004. The requirements are: Bet on road favorites between -5.5 and -10.5 points. Our road team has scored 5 or more points above the league average scoring level in their last three games. If the opponent is playing on two or more days of rest, our road favorite has produced a 62-16 SU (80%) and high profitable 53-24-1 ATS good for 69% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-19-24 | Knicks v. Wolves -2.5 | 133-107 | Loss | -109 | 9 h 5 m | Show | |
Knicks vs Wolves The following NBA betting algorithm has done very well posting a 97-36 SU and 89-41-3 ATS record for 69% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: Bet home favorites. The favorite is averaging 107 to 114 PPG. The opponent allows 107 to 114 PPG. The favorite has seen 205 or fewer combined points scored in each of their last two games. |
|||||||
12-19-24 | Clippers v. Mavs -4 | 118-95 | Loss | -105 | 8 h 14 m | Show | |
Clippers vs Mavs The following NBA betting algorithm has produced an exception record going 30-19 SU 32-15-2 ATS for 68% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on road teams playing on the same on 1 or fewer days of rest. That road team is playing on the same amount of rest as the host. The host is coming off a game making 40% or more of their three-point shots The host saw the total play over by 30 or more points in their previous game. |
|||||||
12-19-24 | Eastern Illinois v. SE Missouri State -4.5 | Top | 72-79 | Win | 100 | 8 h 4 m | Show |
Eastern Illinois vs SE Missouri State The following NCAAM betting algorithm has produced an exception record going 30-19 SU 32-15-2 ATS for 68% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on teams with 7 or more days of rest. That team is coming off a horrid loss by 15 or more points. They were priced as the favorite. If these teams have had 10 or more days of rest, they have gone 12-8 SU (60%) and 16-3 ATS for 84% winning bets since 2019. |
|||||||
12-19-24 | Bulls v. Celtics -14 | 117-108 | Loss | -108 | 7 h 15 m | Show | |
Bulls vs Celtics The following NBA betting algorithm has done very well posting a 97-36 SU and 89-41-3 ATS record for 69% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: Bet on home teams. That home team has allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games. The opponent is coming off a game in which they scored 120 or more points. If the opponent is coming off a loss, our home team soar to a highly profitable 16-4 SU and 15-5 ATS record for 75% winning bets over the past five seasons. If the dog shot 35% or lower from beyond the arc has seen our favorites go 26-6 SU and 26-6 ATS good for 81% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-19-24 | Hornets -4 v. Wizards | 114-123 | Loss | -109 | 7 h 46 m | Show | |
Hornets vs Wizards The following betting algorithm has produced a 195-58 (77%) SU record and a 156-92-5 ATS mark for 63% winning bets over the past 25 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on road favorites priced between 3 and 10 points. The road team has a losing record on the season. Our road team lost the last same season meeting to the host. If the games feature divisional foes our road favorite soars to a 42-5 SU (89%) and 37-9-1 ATS good for 80% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-18-24 | Creighton v. Georgetown +4 | Top | 57-81 | Win | 100 | 7 h 53 m | Show |
Creighton vs Georgetown The following NCAA betting algorithm has gone 27-28 SU (58%) and 35-20 ATS (64%) since 2011. The requirements needed for this a betting opportunity to be validated is as follows: Bet on a home dog priced between 3 and 7 points. The dog is playing three to 7 days of rest. The dog was a winning record. The opponent is not ranked. The dog has covered the spread in four or five of their previous 6 games. The teams are members of the Big East, ACC, SEC, Big-12, or Big-Ten. |
|||||||
12-18-24 | Western Kentucky +7.5 v. James Madison | Top | 17-27 | Loss | -115 | 6 h 58 m | Show |
Western Kentucky vs James Madison The following NCAAF betting algorithm has produced a 9-5 SU and 10-4 ATS for 71.4% winning bets over the past 8 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on a team that has lost to the spread by 55 or more points spanning their previous five games. That team is playing in a bowl game. Roca Baton Bowl Preview: Western Kentucky vs. James Madison The Roca Baton Bowl is set to feature an intriguing matchup between the Western Kentucky Hilltoppers and the James Madison Dukes on Wednesday, December 18, 2024, at FAU Stadium in Boca Raton, Florida. This will be the first time these two teams have faced each other on the gridiron1. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers Western Kentucky enters the bowl game with an 8-5 record after a tough loss in the Conference USA Championship game. The Hilltoppers have been consistent winners under head coach Tyson Helton, winning at least eight games in five of the last six seasons1. However, the team has been hit hard by the transfer portal, with 23 players entering since their last game. Notably, starting quarterback and C-USA Offensive Player of the Year, Caden Veltkamp, has entered the portal. Despite these challenges, Western Kentucky will rely on their strong passing attack led by Veltkamp, who threw for 2,806 yards and 23 touchdowns this season. James Madison Dukes James Madison comes into the bowl game with an 8-4 record under first-year head coach Bob Chesney. The Dukes have had a solid season, including key wins against North Carolina and Coastal Carolina1. However, they will be without their starting quarterback, Alonza Barnett III, who suffered an injury in the regular-season finale. This means James Madison will be starting third-string quarterback Billy Atkins, who has attempted only 46 passes in his career. The Dukes will likely lean heavily on their running game, with George Pettaway and Wayne Knight expected to play key roles. Key Matchups Western Kentucky's Passing Attack vs. James Madison's Pass Defense: Western Kentucky's strong passing attack will be tested against James Madison's top-ranked pass defense. James Madison's Running Game vs. Western Kentucky's Run Defense: With James Madison's quarterback situation uncertain, their running game will be crucial, especially against Western Kentucky's struggling run defense. Weather Conditions The game is expected to have thunderstorms before and during kickoff, with wind gusts over 20 mph, which could impact both teams' passing games. Transfer Portal News Western Kentucky: The Hilltoppers have seen a mass exodus of players to the transfer portal, including key starters like Caden Veltkamp and linebacker Darius Thomas, who has committed to Louisville. James Madison: The Dukes have also been impacted by the transfer portal, losing several players to other programs, but they have managed to maintain a solid roster. Again, the current price showing WKU as a 7-point underdog bas all of this news baked into the market. Just as all the news and rumors are baked into the price of a stock like Nvidia, or a commodity like Crude Oil or Bit Coin. |
|||||||
12-17-24 | Bucks v. Thunder -4.5 | Top | 97-81 | Loss | -109 | 10 h 1 m | Show |
Bucks vs Thunder The following betting algorithm has produced an 22-7 SU (76%) record and 19-10 ATS for 65.5% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. Bet on home teams playing a neutral or on their home court. They are average 9 or more steals per game. The opponent has not played since Saturday. The Under has gone 17-10-2 for 63% winners and suggest an optional 5-Unit play on the Under. Live Betting Strategy: Given the short line and that scoring in the NBA is highly volatile, consider betting 70% of your 8-Unit amount preflop and then look to add the remaining amount on the Thunder at pick-em. Another first half strategy that has been highly profitable is to look for the Bucks to rip off a 10 or more-point scoring run and then add the remaining bet on the Thunder. There have been only 47 games in which a team led start to finish and account for 12% of the 389 games played this season. So, expect multiple led changes, especially in the first half of action and take advantage of them as detailed. |
|||||||
12-17-24 | Michigan State v. Oakland +16.5 | Top | 77-58 | Loss | -107 | 9 h 31 m | Show |
Michigan State vs Oakland The following NCAA betting algorithm has gone 35-29 SU (58%) and 44-19-1 ATS (70%) since 2019. The requirements needed for this a betting opportunity to be validated is as follows: Bet on teams with 7 or more days of rest. That team is coming off a horrid loss by 15 or more points. They were priced as the favorite. If these dogs have had 9 or more days of rest, they have gone 18-14 SU (56%) and 24-7 ATS for 77% winning bets since 2019.If the opponent is ranked (MSU is ranked 20), our dogs have gone 5-6 SU and 9-2 ATS for 82% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-16-24 | Nuggets +1.5 v. Kings | Top | 130-129 | Win | 100 | 10 h 44 m | Show |
Nuggets vs Kings The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 44-34 SU (56%) and 48-29-1 ATS record good for 62.3% winning bets since 1996. The requirements are: Bet on road teams priced between a 3.5-point favorite and 3.5-point underdog. That team is coming off a home win by 20 or more points. The opponent has scored 105 or more points five or more of their last 6 games. If the total is priced at 230 or more points these road teams have gone 10-13 SU and 14-8-1 ATS for 64% winning bets. |
|||||||
12-16-24 | Bears +7.5 v. Vikings | Top | 12-30 | Loss | -119 | 8 h 48 m | Show |
Bears vs Vikings Live Betting Strategy: Consider betting 70% preflop on the Bears and then look to bet the remaining 30%if the Vikings score first or retake the lead during the first half of action. The reason the live betting is valid only during the first half of action is that betting in the second half is limited by the amount of team available to earn a winning bet. In option trading in the markets there is a Greek letter called Theta that measures time decay or the decrease in price of the option that would occur each dayif the price of the underlying stock remained unchanged. If the Vikings score first, I also like adding 10% on the money line and 20% betting the spread on the Bears. The following betting algorithm has produced a 21-34 SU and 34-18-1 ATS mark good for 68% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are: Fade any team that has won 83% of their games in the current season. The game occurs from week 12 on out to the end of the regular season. That team is priced between a –1 and –7-point favorite. This NFL betting algorithm has gone 38-35 SU (52%) and 51-20-2 ATS good for 72% winning bets over the past 15 seasons. The requirements are: Bet on a team that has failed to cover the spread by 33 or more points spanning their previous five games. The opponent has seen their last three games play Over the total by 33 or more points. Prop Bets Not more than 1.0 units and ideally 0.5 units is preferred. Bet OVER 21.5 completions by Caleb Williams. Bet OVER 220.5 passing yards (BetMGM) Caleb Williams. Bet UNDER 6.5 receptions Brock Bower –110 (DraftKings) |